[04 Dec 2008] Sort vs quicksort measured

Contains all messages from the Hollywood mailing list between 01/2006 and 08/2012
Locked
User avatar
lazi
Posts: 552
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 11:08 pm

[04 Dec 2008] Sort vs quicksort measured

Post by lazi »

Note: This is an archived post that was originally sent to the Hollywood mailing list on Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:11:39 +0100

Hi!

So the correct times is the following:

The same table which takes 4913 ms to sort by the Sort() function takes 241 ms by the quicksort algorithm.

User avatar
airsoftsoftwair
Posts: 4318
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 2:33 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

[05 Dec 2008] Re: Sort vs quicksort measured

Post by airsoftsoftwair »

Note: This is an archived post that was originally sent to the Hollywood mailing list on Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:30:39 +0100
Hi!

So the correct times is the following:

The same table which takes 4913 ms to sort by the Sort() function takes 241 ms by the quicksort algorithm.
Yep, I'll throw out the bubble sort and use a more sophisticated algorithm :)

Locked